Relation dl#direct_quality__dqt (dl#quality_or_endurant_or_perdurant,dl#quality)  the DOLCE predicate dqt(x,y,t) means "x is a direct quality of y" (not a quality of a quality of x) but this relation respects the usual reading conventions: the 1st argument has for direct quality the 2nd argument
  supertype:  dl#qt__quality (dl#quality_or_endurant_or_perdurant,dl#quality)  the DOLCE predicate qt(x,y,t) means "x is a quality of y" but this relation respects the usual reading conventions: the 1st argument has for quality the 2nd argument
     supertype:  pm#attribute (?,pm#attribute_or_quality_or_measure)  e.g., [a car, attribute: a weight]
        supertype:  pm#relation_to_attribute_or_quality_or_measure (*,pm#attribute_or_quality_or_measure)
           supertype:  pm#relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
              >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
           supertype:  pm#how_much_relation (*)
              supertype:  pm#how_relation__howrelation (*)
                 supertype:  pm#wh-/how_relation (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relations 
                    >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
        supertype:  pm#attributive_relation__attributiverelation (*)  like pm#binary_relation, this type mostly exists to categorize what cannot be categorized elsewhere
           supertype:  pm#relation_playing_a_special_role (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to their roles ; this is a traditional but quite subjective way of categorizing relations
              >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type


Another search (with same display options)?