Relation kif#sublist__final_segment_of__finalsegmentof (sumo#list,sumo#list)  USE pm#final_segment INSTEAD OF THIS RELATION TYPE; "sublist" is a misleading name; "final_segment_of" is better
  exclusion:  pm#ending_collection
  supertype:  pm#sub_collection__subcollection (pm#collection,pm#collection)  a partial order relation
     supertype:  pm#relation_between_collections (pm#collection,pm#collection+)
        supertype:  pm#relation_from_collection (pm#collection,*)
           supertype:  pm#relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
              >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
           supertype:  pm#what_relation (*)
              supertype:  pm#wh-/how_relation (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relations 
                 >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
        supertype:  pm#relation_to_collection (*,pm#collection)
           supertype:  pm#relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
           supertype:  pm#what_relation (*)
     supertype:  pm#part (?,?)
        supertype:  pm#part_or_parts (?,?)
           supertype:  pm#mereological_relation (?,*)
              supertype:  pm#relation_playing_a_special_role (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to their roles ; this is a traditional but quite subjective way of categorizing relations
                 >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
              supertype:  pm#what_relation (*)
        supertype:  pm#partial_ordering_relation (?,?)  this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#partial_ordering_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
           supertype:  pm#reflexive_relation__reflexiverelation (?,?)  this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#reflexive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
              supertype:  pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
                 supertype:  pm#relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (*)
                    supertype:  pm#relation_with_particular_property (*)  this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categories
                       >part of:  pm#relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
           supertype:  pm#antisymmetric_relation__antisymmetricrelation (?,?)  this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#antisymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
              supertype:  pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
           supertype:  pm#transitive_relation (?,?)  this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#transitive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
              supertype:  pm#binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
     supertype:  pm#partial_ordering_relation (?,?)  this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#partial_ordering_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
  supertype:  pm#final_segment_of__finalsegmentof (pm#collection,pm#collection)  USE pm#final_segment INSTEAD
     supertype:  pm#sub_collection_of (pm#collection,pm#collection)  DO NOT use this type; it only exists because the SUMO does not respect common reading conventions of parameters
        supertype:  pm#relation_between_collections (pm#collection,pm#collection+)


Another search (with same display options)?