daml#sub_class_of__subclassof (class,class) in WebKB, use the link '<'
equal: sub_class_of
supertype: relation_to_another_class (class,class+)
supertype: relation_from_class_to_collection (class,collection)
supertype: relation_from_type_to_collection (type,collection)
supertype: relation_between_collections (collection,collection+)
supertype: relation_from_collection (collection,*)
supertype: relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: what_relation (*)
supertype: wh-/how_relation (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relations
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: relation_to_collection (*,collection)
supertype: relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
supertype: what_relation (*)
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: relation_from_collection (collection,*)
supertype: relation_from_class (class,*)
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: relation_to_another_set_or_class (set_or_class,set_or_class+) this category is needed to group SUMO relations between classes which cannot be subtype of pm#relation_from_type because their signatures curiously also involve sets
supertype: relation_between_collections (collection,collection+)
supertype: relation_to_set_or_class (*,set_or_class)
supertype: relation_to_collection (*,collection)
supertype: subclass_of_or_equal (set_or_class,set_or_class)
supertype: relation_to_another_set_or_class (set_or_class,set_or_class+) this category is needed to group SUMO relations between classes which cannot be subtype of pm#relation_from_type because their signatures curiously also involve sets
supertype: supertype (type,type) in the FT notation, the '<' link is only used to connect to a "strict" supertype
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: generalizing_type (?,type) fuzzy category, DO NOT USE DIRECTLY
supertype: partial_ordering_relation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#partial_ordering_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: reflexive_relation__reflexiverelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#reflexive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (*)
supertype: relation_with_particular_property (*) this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categories
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: antisymmetric_relation__antisymmetricrelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#antisymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: transitive_relation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#transitive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)