Relation rst#antithesis (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)
exclusion: enablement background motivation evidence justify concession
supertype: presentational_rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) connect to details which should increasing the reader's positive regard or enabling the reader to perform the described action
supertype: rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) main sources: the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the PENMAN ontology; DO NOT USE such fuzzy relations: instead, use relations from/to situations!
supertype: relation_from_description_content/medium/container (description_content/medium/container,*)
supertype: relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: contrast (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) comparability and differences of two situations
supertype: subject_matter_rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) connect to details for making a better description
supertype: rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) main sources: the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the PENMAN ontology; DO NOT USE such fuzzy relations: instead, use relations from/to situations!
supertype: symmetric_rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) e.g., rst#restatement
supertype: rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container) main sources: the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the PENMAN ontology; DO NOT USE such fuzzy relations: instead, use relations from/to situations!