Relation rdfs#sub_property_of (binary_relation_type,binary_relation_type) in WebKB, use the link '<'
equal: sub_property_of
supertype: subrelation (relation_type,relation_type) if the common reading conventions of parameters had been respected, this type would have been named subclass_of; every tuple of the 1st argument (r1) is also a tuple of the 2nd argument (r2), i.e. if r1 holds for some arguments arg_1, arg_2, ... arg_n, then the r2 holds for the same arguments; a consequence of this is that a relation and its subrelations must have the same valence
supertype: supertype (type,type) in the FT notation, the '<' link is only used to connect to a "strict" supertype
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: relation_from_collection (collection,*)
supertype: relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: what_relation (*)
supertype: wh-/how_relation (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relations
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: generalizing_type (?,type) fuzzy category, DO NOT USE DIRECTLY
supertype: partial_ordering_relation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#partial_ordering_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: reflexive_relation__reflexiverelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#reflexive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (*)
supertype: relation_with_particular_property (*) this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categories
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: antisymmetric_relation__antisymmetricrelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#antisymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: transitive_relation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#transitive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: relation_to_another_binary_relation_type (binary_relation_type,binary_relation_type)
supertype: relation_from_binary_relation_type (binary_relation_type,*)
supertype: relation_from_relation_type (relation_type,*)
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property