owl#disjoint_with (class,class) the 2 classes have no common subtype/instance; in WebKB, use the link '!'
subtype: complement_class if something is not in one of the classes, then it is in the other, and vice versa; in WebKB, use the link '/'
equal: exclusive_class (pm)
supertype: relation_to_another_class (class,class+)
supertype: relation_from_class_to_collection (class,collection)
supertype: relation_from_type_to_collection (type,collection)
supertype: relation_between_collections (collection,collection+)
supertype: relation_from_collection (collection,*)
supertype: relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: what_relation (*)
supertype: wh-/how_relation (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to the usual who/what/why/where/when/how questions ; this is a traditional but very subjective and ineffective way of categorizing relations
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: relation_to_collection (*,collection)
supertype: relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*) this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
supertype: what_relation (*)
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: relation_from_collection (collection,*)
supertype: relation_from_class (class,*)
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: relation_to_another_set_or_class (set_or_class,set_or_class+) this category is needed to group SUMO relations between classes which cannot be subtype of pm#relation_from_type because their signatures curiously also involve sets
supertype: relation_between_collections (collection,collection+)
supertype: relation_to_set_or_class (*,set_or_class)
supertype: relation_to_collection (*,collection)
supertype: disjoint (set_or_class,set_or_class) like sumo#disjoint but from a a pm#set_or_class to another
supertype: relation_to_another_set_or_class (set_or_class,set_or_class+) this category is needed to group SUMO relations between classes which cannot be subtype of pm#relation_from_type because their signatures curiously also involve sets
supertype: exclusive_type__exclusivetype (type,type) in WebKB, use the '!' link
supertype: relation_from_type (type,*) type of relations from a concept/relation type, i.e. in RDFS terminology, from a class or a property
supertype: different__different_from__differentfrom (?,?)
supertype: irreflexive_relation__irreflexiverelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#irreflexive_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (*)
supertype: relation_with_particular_property (*) this rather fuzzy type permits to group categorization schemes less common than those covered by the previous sibling categories
>part of: relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
supertype: symmetric_relation__symmetricrelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#symmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)
supertype: antisymmetric_relation__antisymmetricrelation (?,?) this category only serves structuration purposes: it is instance of pm#antisymmetric_relation_type which is not instance of pm#class_of_inheritable_relation_type
supertype: binary_relation_with_particular_mathematical_property (?,?)