Relation rst#antithesis (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)
  exclusion:  enablement  background  motivation  evidence  justify  concession
  supertype:  presentational_rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  connect to details which should increasing the reader's positive regard or enabling the reader to perform the described action
     supertype:  rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  main sources: the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the PENMAN ontology; DO NOT USE such fuzzy relations: instead, use relations from/to situations!
        supertype:  relation_from_description_content/medium/container (description_content/medium/container,*)
           supertype:  relation_from/to_thing_of_common_kind (*)  this type permits to categorize relations according to their signatures and hence offers (i) a concise way to set essential exclusion relations, and (ii) a systematic and easy-to-follow categorization
              >part of:  relation__related_thing__relatedthing___related_with  type for any relation (unary, binary, ..., *-ary) and instance of pm#relation_type
  supertype:  contrast (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  comparability and differences of two situations
     supertype:  subject_matter_rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  connect to details for making a better description
        supertype:  rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  main sources: the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the PENMAN ontology; DO NOT USE such fuzzy relations: instead, use relations from/to situations!
     supertype:  symmetric_rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  e.g., rst#restatement
        supertype:  rhetorical_relation (description_content/medium/container,description_content/medium/container)  main sources: the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the PENMAN ontology; DO NOT USE such fuzzy relations: instead, use relations from/to situations!


Another search (with same display options)?